August 17, 2022


A few weeks ago, I asked Adam Liptak – the Times Supreme Court correspondent – To preview key cases Due to which the term of the court will come to an end. Adam was prophesying, predicting every major decision correctly. Today, he returns to the newspaper, answering my questions about the behind-the-scenes atmosphere in court.

David: The last few months have been one of the most unusual in the modern history of the Court – a major leak After the decision to have an abortion, as you wrote, will change American life in major ways. Inside the court, do you think things would have been different too?

Adam: The Supreme Court building has been closed to the public since the start of the pandemic. Then, shortly after the leak of Rae’s draft in early May, which called for Roe v. Wade, the courthouse was surrounded by an eight-foot fence. Always closed and inaccessible, the court is now impenetrable.

The release of the verdict in the abortion case highlighted another way in which the court withdrew from public scrutiny. For unexplained reasons, judges have stopped announcing their decisions from the bench, leaving behind a tradition, both formal and solemn. In the old days, majority opinion writers would give a quick and interactive summary of decisions that could be extremely valuable to a reporter on deadlines and, in detail, to members of the public trying to understand the decision.

More important yet were verbal dissent, reserved for decisions that, in a minority of judges, believed were deeply wrong. In normal times, one or more of the three liberal judges who dissented on abortion would have voiced their opposition. These days, courts work to post PDFs of their decisions, robbing them of opportunity for celebrations, drama, and insight.

That’s why lawyers who advocate cases and journalists who cover court refresh their browsers to find out about decisions the same way everyone else does. But the justices have returned to the courtroom to argue, haven’t they?

Yes, they have taken a different approach with arguments. After hearing them by telephone for most of the pandemic, the judges returned to the bench in October. Journalists with Supreme Court press credentials were allowed to appear and the public could listen to the live-streamed audio on the court’s website. It is not clear why the opinion could not be declared in a similar manner.

I haven’t been to court since last argument of the present word, on April 27, when Chief Justice John Roberts became emotional as he bid farewell to a retired aide, Justice Stephen Breuer. But there is every reason to think that the leak, the investigation involved, the controversy surrounding Justice Clarence Thomas’ failure to recuse himself from a case that connected His wife’s attempts to reverse the election And the genuine security concerns of the judges make the court a miserable place.

In the comments in May, not long after the leak, Justice Thomas reflected That’s how things had changed on the court since its 11-year extension without changes to its membership before Chief Justice Roberts arrived in 2005. “This is not the court of that era,” Justice Thomas said. each other. We may have been a dysfunctional family, but we were one family.”

A less collegial court seems like it could be especially problematic for three liberal judges. There are now five Republican-appointed judges who is even more conservative than roberts, If the court is a less cooperative place, I think it gives judges in the minority – both liberals and, in some cases, Roberts – less ability to shape decisions.

Yes, although it is possible to reduce the power of the collegium. Judges vote based on the strength of relevant arguments and desired outcomes, not on how likable their allies are.

The judges say there is no vote-trading in all cases, and I believe them. On the other hand, there are certainly interactions within cases. It seems tolerably clear, for example, that Justices Breyer and Elena Kagan shifted positions in part of a 2012 case that upheld a significant portion of the Affordable Care Act to ensure that They will secure Chief Justice Roberts’ vote in the second part.

Judges may well be prepared to narrow or reshape draft opinions attempting to speak for a five-judicial majority in exchange for one vote. But once the author has five, the value of another possible vote drops. It is this dynamic that worries court liberals.

On Thursday, Justice Breyer officially retired and helped administer the oath to his replacement, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. How do judges usually welcome a new member?

When a new justice joins the Supreme Court, tradition requires the second-junior justice to arrange a smaller party. For example, in 2006, when Justice Samuelalito came on board, the task fell to Justice Breyer, who knew his new colleague as a Phillies fan. Before dessert was served, Justice Breyer introduced a special guest: the team’s mascot, Philly Fnatic.

This year, Justice Amy Connie Barrett is the second-most junior justice and will likely be in charge of Justice Jackson’s reception.

And now that the court is on leave until October, what do the judges usually do?

They often teach courses in foreign places. For example, in 2012, after voting to uphold the Affordable Care Act, Chief Justice Roberts left for Malta to teach a two-week class on Supreme Court history. “Malta, as you know, is an impregnable island fortress,” he said. “It seemed like a good idea.”

More about Adam Liptak: He began his Times career as a copy boy in 1984, bringing coffee to editors and occasionally writing. After a stint at law school and a Wall Street law firm, he returned to the paper in 1992, joining its corporate legal department, before moving to the newsroom as a reporter a decade later. He reads a lot and plays poker a lot.

  • Russia claims it has seized Lisichansk, a prize city in Ukraine’s east, and blames Ukraine for the blasts that rocked a Russian border town. here is the latest,

  • The men of Ukraine voluntarily defended their homes. Now, many of these untrained soldiers are dying on the other side of the country,

  • For months, Russia has beaten Ukrainian citizens – and made excuses To avoid responsibility.

  • Russian war crimes may be investigated by Ukrainian and international agencies biggest in history,

  • rising fuel price The poor are hitting the countries especially hard, with many residents struggling to keep lights on or cook.


Sunday Question: Is Roe’s Fall Changing the Medium Term?

Commentary of Noah Rothman skeptical, arguing that crime and inflation Voters’ biggest concern remains, CNN’s Harry Anten thinks the ruling may be elevate Democrats in state-level racesWhose winners will decide whether abortion is legal or not.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: