Meghan Markle’s $25m Spotify podcast debut slammed by critics


Meghan Markle’s first podcast released on Tuesday, linked to her deal with streaming giant Spotify and reportedly worth $25 million, drew an overwhelming response from critics and some members of the public alike.

as Breitbart News informed ofPrince Harry’s wife used case To focus on herself and through that address a host of feminists are talking, starting with a story about how she found the multinational, Procter & Gamble, an ad after sending a letter about it. To change to be less sexist. She announced that she was 11 years old at the time.

She then promised, as Breitbart pointed out, that the podcast series would overall “rip the boxes that women for generations held” by checking labels such as “slut”, “diva”, and so-called “B-word”. Explaining that “feminist ideology permeated every aspect of my life.”

In a detailed discussion with guest Serena Williams, titled “The Misconception of Ambition”, Meghan argued how being labeled “ambitious” hurt her feelings with pain linking past disappointments with the British royal family. Arrived.

She said that she “never recalled feeling personally the negative connotation behind the word ambitious, until I started dating my now husband” and revealed the “pain” she later experienced on her own. But endured.

The former actress added: “And obviously ambition is a terrible, terrible thing. For a woman that’s according to some. So since I’ve felt the negativity behind it, it’s really hard to feel.”

Royal commentator Angela Levine was the one who quickly pointed out the hypocrisy of the comment, suggesting that Markle “would still be a D-list celebrity if she hadn’t married a prince,” daily mail reports,

He said Meghan came across as both “ungrateful and suffering” when she had ‘so many opportunities that others didn’t’, adding that many royals are ambitious and need to raise money for their careers and charities. There has been success in the matter.

There were a lot of people who took to social media and agreed.

Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told the outlet of his confusion over his approach.

She told MailOnline: “She undoubtedly feels she has been singled out. The interview was about a misunderstanding of ambition, but the implication here is that she felt chosen after dating Harry. She Was already ambitious and did well in Suits but she is not top league television.

“There is certainly nothing wrong with being ambitious and being a royal, in fact the role encourages a member of the royal family to be ambitious, to help those in need. Diana was very ambitious, her charitable work and her Public profiles were synonymous, that’s what eventually happened, but he did very well.”

Such was the view from Down Under.

australian The newspaper’s Sophie Ellsworth said Meghan Markle is “a narcissist of the highest order” and that the first episode of her podcast was “absolutely horrible”.

“This woman just won’t give up,” she Told Sky News Australia. “I am so sorry to be part of the Queen’s family.”

The podcast comes ahead of Harry and Meghan’s return to England next month for events in Manchester and London before heading to Germany.

Follow Simon Kent on Twitter: Or e-mail: [email protected]


Leave a Reply