State leaders back down against ballot measure that would allow San Bernardino County to explore segregation

[ad_1]

State leaders are pushing against a November voting measure that would allow San Bernardino County to seek separation from California.

State Sen. Connie Leyva (D-Chino), Assembly Majority Leader Eloise Gómez Reyes (D-Colton) and Assembly Member Freddy Rodriguez (D-Pomona) expressed their “shock” in a letter to the board this week by observers. ” and expressed disappointment in the final vote to put the measure on the ballot. The measure will allow the county to assess ways to obtain a “fair share of the state’s funding,” including potentially seceding from California.

Legislators wrote that they were “shocked by the rationale behind this initiative, concerned about the cost of asking taxpayers to ask local officials to do their jobs, and disappointed by the story being created about our community.

“Your action today to put this question on the ballot for San Bernardino County voters begs the question, why are we spending public resources putting it on the ballot in the first place, with unclear results?” they wrote. “Public resources, including paying for employees’ time with taxpayer dollars, are being used not only to draft this item but to put it on the ballot in November.”

The lawmakers also said the proposal “disregards the work being done every day to bring more resources to San Bernardino County,” emphasizing that they brought $65 million to the Inland Empire this year.

first board of supervisors Green-lit the remedy last week In the first step of adding it to the ballot. Tuesday’s meeting gave the second final vote on the matter.

If voters support the measure and if the board of observers decides to secede from the state, they will still need approval from the US Congress and the California Legislature to do so.

Sheriff Shannon Dickus voiced support for the measure during Tuesday’s meeting, saying county resources have been stressed because 2011 State Reorganization Act With the aim of reducing the number of overpopulated state prisons back to county jails.

“In restructuring state prisons, this county has spent about $40 million trying to build infrastructure and the responsibility of the state was pushed onto us at the local level,” he said.

Former candidate for county supervisor Dejona Shaw spoke out against the ballot during the meeting, emphasizing the need for the county to prioritize funding to address homelessness and the ongoing mental health crisis in the state.

“We can dress up stateside by saying that we’ll do a study to see if we’re getting our fair share,” she said. “With respect, we don’t need to spend a red cent of taxpayers’ hard-earned money to get information leaders should already be doing and information that’s available to each of us for free if we can. Just ask.”

Board Chairman Kurt Hagman called the possibility of seceding from California and forming or joining a neighboring state as a “distant last resort”, while stressing the need for a study that “allows the county to gather data that allows us to will help develop more effective strategies to secure a fair return on our tax dollars.”

“This potential option will be very difficult to achieve, and all five observers really like to call California their home,” he said in the statement. “However, none of us is willing to stop doing everything we can to ensure that the dollars we send to the state serve to meet our most important needs, such as public Increasing security, eliminating homelessness, creating jobs and economic growth, and providing quality roads and other infrastructure.

[ad_2]

Leave a Reply